is graffiti art or vandalism debate

Since vandalism according to your argument Vandalism is willful or ignorant destruction of artistic or literary treasures and graffiti can be done on paper without vandalising or destroying anything it is considered art. I think That graffiti is vandalism because.

Random Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Writing Graffiti Art

This is certainly not street art.

. Also graffiti is technically art since graffiti is also known as street art. B1 Objectives Learn some details about the history of graffiti Learn about main characteristics of graffiti Learn vocabulary related to graffiti Ss familiarize with ideas related to controversy around graffiti. Graffiti should not be labeled as vandalism.

It literally has the word art in it. This controversial interrogation can be illustrated by the artist bandos quote graffiti is not. 1st lesson 1-2 hours Level.

Is graffiti art or vandalism. 3 some kids can go for a walk and see this graffiti and they may want to do the same. Although graffiti is illegal and is considered vandalism by the law some people considered it art because it is a way people can express themselves and let their voices be heard.

But however much some graffiti looks pretty its understandable why some consider it as vandalism. 2 it can be illegal. Graffiti is a type of modern art and it is a great way for some people to express their thoughts feelings and imaginations.

Pdf Defining Graffiti Art Or Vandalism Blake Wilkerson Academia Edu. Masuzi 2 years ago No Comments. The age-old debate surrounding graffiti is to do with whether its art or vandalism.

Unfortunately because street art is highly visible and therefore accessible it can be misused as a propaganda tool and in some cases to discriminate or advertise hatred. Often the two intertwine as some graffiti is so obviously completed by an individualindividuals who have a good eye for colour and design. Prev Article Next Article.

Graffiti being classed as art or vandalism is a debate that constantly goes on and I agree with your overall conclusion. The debate is ongoing. Is graffiti art or vandalism debate.

Graffiti can be used as artistic expression or a form of communication but many people consider it. If it was aplied to a canvas or wall etc that was designated to be art then it would be art. Graffiti is vandalism because it is in a place in which it does not belong.

Vandalism vs Art. Throughout your article I noticed that you gave the opinion from George C Stowers saying that little tags should not be classed as art and I agree with this because I feel that some people may use the word art as an. The aspect of graffiti as an underground art culture that is intended to pass on messages of dissatisfaction anger retaliation and warnings to people such as politicians gangs and employers not always have the right perspective.

That is what one has to decide once the canvas wall etc. Start a New Debate. No responses have been submitted.

Graffiti art is exactly the expression of a human applied to a wall. Lastly graffiti art has been around for years. 1 government lose money to clean up streets because it ruins walls so graffiti is considered to be visual pollution.

To the artists or vandals it is a form of street art which usually involves either tagging or the creation of more complex paintings. People often dont like things they dont understand but graffiti will be a way for artists to express their opinions about the world. Class Debate Graffiti.

While a good amount of graffiti are painted illegally on public and private properties We should not obliterate its intrinsic qualityart. In many cases graffiti could be vulgar crude and can be considered nothing but pure vandalism. This argument is not valid because by categorising graffiti is vandalism you are also taking away the rights for the artists to paint.

The discrepancy between graffiti as both vandalism and art reached a zenith in 2010 when the then prime minister David Cameron visited Washington DC and presented Barack Obama with a canvas by. The discrepancy between graffiti as both vandalism and art reached a zenith in 2010 when the then prime minister david cameron visited washington dc and presented barack obama with a canvas by. Whether people like it or not graffiti is considered art it always has and it always will be.

Defining graffiti art or vandalism graffiti vandalism essay asta edu au graffiti is art essay asta edu au effects of vandalism in school essay. Are you happy to see urban environments transformed in colourful and creative ways. Graffiti is art without a doubt The basic steps of graffiti are the same as paintingsketching Outlining Shading And coloring.

Vandalism is defined as Willful or malicious destruction of public or private property. Is Graffiti Art Or Vandalism Debate Essay. 0 Say Yes 0 Say No No responses have been submitted.

Graffiti is mostly done outside the law with artists taking huge risks when creating their works. In fact graffiti art existed around the dream time the stone age the bronze age. Graffiti art is completely art.

Or is it vandalism. To conclude people tend to not like and think graffiti is vandalism simply because they dont understand it. The artist could just be stating their territory with a tag just like a dog but is still considered art.

An Exhibition Of Graffiti At The Indianapolis Museum Of Art At Newfields Is Adding Fuel To The Debate Over Whether Aer Graffiti Indianapolis Museum Art Museum